Dr. Fiona Hill, the former top National Security Council expert on Russia, set the record straight on that country’s attack on the 2016 election.
“Based on questions and statements I have heard, some of you on this committee appear to believe that Russia and its security services did not conduct a campaign against our country — and that perhaps, somehow, for some reason, Ukraine did,” Hill testified during the House impeachment inquiry last week.
“This is a fictional narrative that has been perpetrated and propagated by the Russian security services themselves. The unfortunate truth is that Russia was the foreign power that systematically attacked our democratic institutions in 2016. This is the public conclusion of our intelligence agencies, confirmed in bipartisan congressional reports. It is beyond dispute, even if some of the underlying details must remain classified.”
America is not the only nation targeted by Russia. The Kremlin’s assault on elections — democracy’s DNA — is apparent in many Western nations. This includes the United Kingdom, where Brits will have to wait until after the Dec. 12 election for a report on the extent of Russian interference in the 2016 Brexit referendum.
Russia will likely try again in the interest of advancing its cynical goals, which Hill starkly described as “to weaken our country — to diminish America’s global role and to neutralize a perceived U.S. threat to Russian interests. President (Vladimir) Putin and the Russian security services aim to counter U.S. foreign policy objectives in Europe, including in Ukraine, where Moscow wishes to reassert political and economic dominance.”
Russia cannot match the U.S., let alone NATO, in military spending, so it’s using asymmetric measures to disrupt the West.
You have free articles remaining.
“The Russians have a really dark purpose, which is to undermine democracy,” Richard Stengel, the former undersecretary of state for public diplomacy and public affairs, told an editorial writer. Stengel, a former Time editor and author of “Information Wars: How We Lost The Global Battle Of Disinformation And What We Can Do About It,” added that “we’re still in an era where offensive capabilities are greater than the defensive capabilities, which is worrisome going into a really critical presidential election.”
A recent joint statement from the departments of Justice, Defense and Homeland Security and other federal entities warned of looming 2020 interference. “Our adversaries want to undermine our democratic institutions, influence public sentiment and affect government policies. Russia, China, Iran and other foreign malicious actors all will seek to interfere in the voting process or influence voter perceptions,” the statement said.
“An informed public is a resilient public,” the statement added. Stengel agreed on the need for more media literacy as well as more accountability for social media companies. “Every voter in a way is a target of entities that malignly seek to influence them,” Stengel said.
That includes voices here at home, which is a factor Hill highlighted in her testimony. “President Putin and the Russian security services operate like a super PAC,” she said. “They deploy millions of dollars to weaponize our own political opposition research and false narratives. When we are consumed by partisan rancor, we cannot combat these external forces as they seek to divide us against each another, degrade our institutions and destroy the faith of the American people in our democracy.”
Russia’s, not America’s, interests are advanced by the “fictional narrative” that it wasn’t the Kremlin that attacked the U.S. in 2016. On that point, a deeply divided Congress, and country, must agree.
Post a comment as
Report
Watch this discussion.
(5) comments
Those fake facebook ads sure swayed an election. I hope the 2020 ballots are written in English and Russian so my comrade can help me choose which candidate to vote for.
“Based on questions and statements I have heard, some of you on this committee appear to believe that Russia and its security services did not conduct a campaign against our country — and that perhaps, somehow, for some reason, Ukraine did,”
Unfortunately, loony toon conspiracy theories are rampant among Republicans in Congress, as well as internet comment threads. Secret Agent and suer of internet cows Nunes does his best. I wouldn’t have expected it from Stefanik but she certainly seems willing to dabble in them lately. Vladimir Putin sends his thanks for supporting Dear Leader over Country. It’s the Russian Model.
The loony toon conspiracy theory was the Trump/Russian collusion. Should we just nuke Russia now? Whaddaya say?
Should we just nuke Russia now?
Right, because that’s the only alternative to Trump’s groveling isn’t it? This is a guy who can go out and insult everyone from Rosie O’Donnell to Arnold Schwarzenegger in the most childish ways imaginable, but has nothing but praise for the guy behind interfering in our elections. But, oh that’s right. It was Ukraine that did it.
Dr. Fiona Hill: "Russia today poses a greater foreign policy and security challenge to the United States and its Western allies than at any time since the height of the Cold War. Its annexation of Crimea, war in Ukraine’s Donbas region, and military intervention in Syria have upended Western calculations from Eastern Europe to the Middle East. Russia’s intervention in Syria, in particular, is a stark reminder that Russia is a multi-regional power….."
Holy Russiaphobe Batman! Dr. Hill seemed to have missed the implosion of the "Evil Empire" three decades ago.
Crimea was the warm water port of Russia for longer than California has been the warm water port of the US. It has been Russia's "Red Line" since Catherine the Great, populated by Russians who speak Russian. Crimea only became part of Ukraine by USSR decree, and Dr. Hill is defending the barbarous former Soviet union with typical US hegemonic arrogance. What does US national security have to do with the status of Crimea?
The shallow-thinking war mongers in Washington opened up a can of sectarian whoop-a$$ when they overthrew the first civil government of Ukraine by removing "pro-Putin" Yanukovych (advised by Manafort) and installing ultra-nationalists in 2014. The morons had no historical understanding that the people of Crimea and the Donbas regions would seek to return to their Russian roots as THEIR solution. But Dr. Hill knows what these people need better than these people, of course. And the bureaucrats in Washington turn this situation they caused on its head and blame the mess on Putin, and the sock-puppet media enables the lies.
It's people like Dr. Hill and John Bolton who continue to peddle US imperialism and the Russian bogieman, and people like President Trump and Tulsi Gabbard who oppose unnecessary interventions and wars. Russia has the GDP of Italy. They can't expand anywhere.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Comments will not be posted if any of the following rules are violated:
- Comments must be contained to the topic of the articles only.
- Comments must be civil in tone and cannot contain personal insults directed toward another reader.
- Profanities cannot be used, including abbreviations or acronyms.
- Comments critical of crime or accident victims, or imply guilt are not allowed.
- Comments that are potentially libelous, including those that contain accusations not supported by facts are not allowed.
- Comments that appear to be taunting others who comment are not allowed.
- Comments should be brief and never more than 1,000 characters.