Skip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.
Fact-checking congressional candidates on health care, immigration
NY-21 fact check

Fact-checking congressional candidates on health care, immigration

  • 5

U.S. Rep. Elise Stefanik’s campaign has made several inaccurate claims last week regarding health care, immigration and her rival Democrat Tedra Cobb’s positions on these issues.

Cobb has also released some statements on Medicare votes by Stefanik, a Republican, that lacked context.

On Friday, Stefanik’s campaign released a statement, saying that Cobb “supports Medicare for All for illegal immigrants.”

“Taxin’ Tedra must immediately explain to North Country voters why she believes American taxpayers should have to pay for Medicare for All for illegal immigrants,” Stefanik wrote in the release.

This claim about American taxpayers paying for undocumented immigrants’ health care is inaccurate. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that 50% to 75% of undocumented immigrants pay federal, state and local taxes. Undocumented immigrants can acquire individual tax identification numbers in lieu of Social Security numbers.

“I believe that everyone deserves access to quality, affordable healthcare,” Cobb wrote in an email. “I think the best way to get there is to give people the option to buy into Medicare.”

“Taxin’ Tedra believes taxpayers should have to spend trillions of dollars for Medicare for All for non-citizens,” a press release from Stefanik spokeswoman Madison Anderson said. “She already publicly said she supports zero resources for border security. Taxin’ Tedra wants illegal immigrants to pour into our country and then she wants us to pay for their healthcare.”

Cobb declined to speak Friday on border security. In the past, she has spoken against building a wall on the southern U.S. border, saying money should be spent on other infrastructure projects instead.

She has never advocated for “zero resources for border security.”

The Stefanik campaign’s reasoning behind saying Cobb wants undocumented immigrants to be covered by Medicare for All stems from a now-deleted policy platform on Cobb’s website that states her “vision” is to “provide comprehensive health insurance for all United States residents.”

“This means non-citizens currently illegally residing in our country,” Anderson wrote.

“Believing NY-21 taxpayers should have to pay for Medicare for All for illegal immigrants when U.S. citizens are struggling during the COVID-19 pandemic is completely unacceptable,” Stefanik wrote.

Cobb said Stefanik is “unpacking the worst of Washington D.C. and bringing it to us,” in an email.

“All the lying, the name-calling, and the partisanship,” she continued. “That’s not who we are in the North Country, and if Elise spent any time here, she’d know that.”

Medicare for All

In the past week, Stefanik’s campaign has said Cobb is “hiding” her support for Medicare for All and accused local media of helping her by “ignoring” it.

In the 2018 election cycle, Cobb said she supported Medicare for All, a variety of single payer health care. In the 2020 election cycle, however, Cobb has said she supports a Medicare public option, or the option to pay into or to “buy” Medicare. That is a position also supported by Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-NY, among other Democrats.

“Taxin’ Tedra continues to use the local media to attempt to hide from her well-documented, on the record positions,” Anderson wrote in an email Wednesday. “Just because Taxin’ Tedra realized this radical, socialist position is untenable in the North Country and has now flip-flopped and scrubbed the position from her website does not mean the local media should ignore this basic fact.”

Cobb says her goal of “everyone having health care” has stayed the same but that the method of doing that has changed between her 2018 and 2020 campaigns.

The Enterprise and other North Country newspapers have informed readers that Cobb supported Medicare for All in her 2018 run against Stefanik but has moved to favoring a Medicare buy-in program in this campaign.

Polling by the Kaiser Family Foundation shows that 56% of Americans support Medicare for All and that 68% favor a government-administered “public option.”

Around 48% favor both. But these plans are generally less popular among Republicans, who make up a majority of New York’s 21st Congressional District’s voters.

Cobb also released a statement saying Stefanik “voted to cut Medicare” funding by hundreds of billions of dollars in 2017 and 2018. This statement is lacking context. These votes were on wide-reaching funding bills determining spending for the entire government, and while they included Medicare cuts, they were package deals that also contain many other financial cuts and additions.

Cobb’s change

Cobb explained her switch. She called Medicare for All a “one-size fits all” plan and said a public buy-in option should be added to the current private health care system; that way, people could keep their current insurance if they want.

“I have been consistent in my values, that everyone should have quality and affordable health care,” Cobb said.

She said a Medicare public option would be helpful during the COVID-19 pandemic. Citing a study by Families USA, Cobb said 5.4 million Americans have lost their health care because of pandemic layoffs. Many of these people are rushing to apply for coverage through the Affordable Care Act, according to the New York Times.

“Stefanik has spent six years in Washington,” Cobb wrote in an email. “We still haven’t seen her health care plan. Let’s be clear: she doesn’t have one.”


Get Government & Politics updates in your inbox!

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.


News Alerts

Breaking News