Skip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.
Edit
Editorial: On lawns in Queensbury, political messages are legal and fair
Editorial

Editorial: On lawns in Queensbury, political messages are legal and fair

  • 4
{{featured_button_text}}

John Strough’s knee-jerk reaction, taking offense to a lawn banner and threatening a lawsuit over it, is both understandable and wrong-headed.

Strough, supervisor of Queensbury, is mad that a couple of residents are displaying pro-Trump banners that include a synonym for nonsense. “Trump 2020 No More Bull——,“ the banners say.

The creators could have used the word hooey or baloney or balderdash. But they went with the earthier term.

The message of the banner, depending on your point of view, could be that Trump is a no-nonsense guy who will get a lot done in a second term. Or it could be that a second-term Trump administration, empowered by re-election, will run roughshod over our country, punishing the president’s enemies and rewarding his allies.

The connotation could be inspiring or frightening, but either way, it’s not obscene.

Another political sign of the season, which has also been spotted in Queensbury, compares Donald Trump to a sexually transmitted disease.

“STD,” it says “Stop the Donald 2020 Don’t let the infection spread.”

It’s a pointed jab at a president who has spent a lifetime bragging about sexual conquests. It also seems to reference his leadership during a pandemic when “the infection has spread” to every part of the country.

It’s more vulgar than the “no-nonsense” sign, even though it contains no swear words. It would be a lot more awkward to explain the STD sign than the “no-nonsense” sign to your toddler.

Context matters. It’s not only the words you use but what they are saying that determines vulgarity and obscenity.

You do not have a First Amendment right to display just anything on a sign on your lawn.

You can’t write messages advocating violence, especially not against specific people, and you can’t accuse people of crimes or otherwise slander them.

Explicit descriptions of sex acts are also probably illegal, although you might get away with it if they had “serious literary, political or scientific value.”

Arguing over the subjective meanings of words and phrases has fattened the wallets of a lot of lawyers. There is no need for Queensbury to contribute to that waste of money.

These signs are fair. The pro-Trump sign highlights an aspect of his leadership style — his open expression of his preferences — that his supporters like. The anti-Trump sign points to an aspect of his character — his womanizing — that his detractors find distasteful. Both signs show the way many of us react to the president on a gut level, with admiration or disgust. Restraint is needed when seeking to curtail free expression, especially political expression. Not every message should be allowed, but these should be. Our outrage and our lawsuits should be reserved for signs that are, actually, outrageous or illegal.

Local editorials are written by The Post-Star’s editorial board, which includes Ben Rogers, president and director of local sales and marketing; Brian Corcoran, regional finance director and former publisher; Will Doolittle, projects editor; and Bob Condon, local news editor.

17
3
0
0
0

Get local news delivered to your inbox!

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.

Topics

News Alerts

Breaking News