Real Estate Upickem Golf

ENDORSEMENT: Gillibrand will serve upstate well in Senate

2012-10-26T23:45:00Z 2012-10-28T00:04:18Z ENDORSEMENT: Gillibrand will serve upstate well in Senate Glens Falls Post-Star
October 26, 2012 11:45 pm

You have to go back 44 years to find another senator with upstate roots as deep as Kirsten Gillibrand’s.

In 1968, Charles Goodell was appointed by Gov. Nelson Rockefeller to succeed Robert Kennedy in the U.S. Senate after his assassination while running for president the previous June.

Goodell was born in Jamestown, where he served several terms in Congress before accepting the appointment to the Senate.

Before that, you have to go back to Geneseo native James Wadsworth to find another U.S. senator with deep ties to upstate. He served from 1915 to 1927.

We would be the first to acknowledge Gillibrand’s Republican challenger, Wendy Long, faced long odds in getting our endorsement for the U.S. Senate and that begins with Gillibrand’s upstate roots.

We often feel New York’s problems are not so much Democrats vs. Republicans, but upstaters vs. downstaters. It is as if our state breeds two species of politicians and neither one is able to understand the other.

Gillibrand faced long odds to win the local 20th Congressional District seat when she ran against Republican incumbent John Sweeney in 2006, and few gave her much of a chance.

We remember her coming in for an editorial board meeting at our newspaper a full year before the election. She proved quickly she was a serious candidate, willing to work hard to understand the district and its problems. When Sweeney self-destructed in the closing weeks of that race, Gillibrand turned a double-digit deficit into a victory speech on election night and reelection two years later — unprecedented for a Democratic candidate in this region.

She proved to be an energetic and passionate advocate of all local issues. She established congress-on-your-corner meetings in communities all across the district and was far more accessible than Sweeney had ever been. She was one of the first members of Congress to show her commitment to transparency by listing every meeting on her website, especially those with lobbyists. She found a home for herself on the agriculture committee and worked hard for local farmers.

You would be hard-pressed to find a political candidate who has risen as fast as Gillibrand in the past six years, and we believe she is still learning on the job.

It is rare that we get the chance to know a U.S. senator, but in this case, we feel we know Gillibrand and what she stands for and believe she will be an outstanding advocate for upstate New York and the Glens Falls region in the future.

That’s not to say she does not come with baggage.

We would be the first to acknowledge a concern with some of her changes of heart, especially regarding gun control.

As an upstate congresswoman, Gillibrand was a very moderate Democrat in a Republican district. Being a U.S. senator from New York comes with being far more liberal on many issues than we are comfortable with.

Her challenger told us in a meeting with our editorial board, “She has voted much differently (in the Senate) than she did as an upstate congresswoman.”

That is undeniable.

Long is a candidate with an impressive resume that includes clerking for Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and starting the Judicial Confirmation Network, to provide aid to conservative justices in their confirmation hearings.

Long’s politics are conservative, but she also painted herself as an outsider dissatisfied with career politicians who have made Washington an out-of-control bureaucracy. She pledged to make across-the-board cuts in every department in the federal government, including defense. She said there were no sacred cows.

“This is not an election, it is an emergency,” Long said.

In the recent debate at Skidmore College, Gillibrand said “fracking” needed more study, while Long pronounced the drilling technique for natural gas safe and said a certain amount of methane in drinking water was normal and not dangerous.

It was a jaw-dropping moment for some of us on the editorial board who believe otherwise.

We still believe Gillibrand brings upstate sensibilities to her job and is far more moderate than some of her recent stands in the Senate. Obviously, politics corrupts all candidates to some degree.

But we also fear Long’s politics are too far right to allow for any constructive compromise in the years to come, something we believe is absolutely necessary to move our country forward.

We’d like to see what Sen. Gillibrand can do with a full term in the Senate. We believe she is still learning and believe she will never forget her upstate roots. We believe those upstate values will serve her and all of New York well in the U.S. Senate.

Local editorials represent the opinion of The Post-Star editorial board, which consists of Publisher Rick Emanuel, Editor Ken Tingley, Projects Editor Will Doolittle and citizen representative Mark Bergman.

Copyright 2015 Glens Falls Post-Star. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(6) Comments

  1. T Wayne Lucas III
    Report Abuse
    T Wayne Lucas III - October 28, 2012 9:24 am
    Every state has two senators. Except for New York. We have one. And a rubber stamp.
  2. constitutionalpatriot
    Report Abuse
    constitutionalpatriot - October 28, 2012 8:34 am
    Sorry. I don't believe she will continue to advocate for what she once said she believed in, after the incredible bold faced statement in her TV ad. She said she "passed the bill" to ban congress from insider trading or profiting from intelligence gained from their elected positions. True on it's face, but ingenuine. She herself was one of the worst offenders, grew her personal wealth tremendously using information gained from her position and trading/profiting from it and now that she's got hers she's going to claim credit for ending the practice. Untrustwothy, unethical, deceptive, almost an outright lie! Oh, and by the way, Schummer was even like the top 5 insider traders/profiteers. Just another reason for term limits. Also, it's not me demo bashing, the political elite on both sides of the isle were knee deep in the practice. Where are all the "middle of the road" candidates? That's right, the rep/demo corrupt party systems weeds them out to protect the status quo.
  3. Docbill5701
    Report Abuse
    Docbill5701 - October 28, 2012 6:44 am
    Check her record and your paycheck, if you have one? You may, if you can, change your mind!
  4. someone in glens falls
    Report Abuse
    someone in glens falls - October 27, 2012 9:27 pm
    I met her way back when. She was so nice. I really liked her. Very genuine. I will always support her. I'll never forget that.
  5. Report Abuse
    - October 27, 2012 7:18 pm
    Solid choice by "TPS."

    Sen. G's stronger local ties AND she's not another all-for-the-rich Republican.

    This region, less liberal & more MS-like than most of the rest of the state, tends to be part of the live poor - vote rich coalition of the Joe 6-pks & the wealthy that's enabled the wealthiest to CORRUPT US gov't in the singular interest of the wealthy (SEE: Bush II's tax cuts, e.g.).

    Here, the poor are usually sold overwhelmingly GOP; even though a reliable RECORD proves they damage their own prospects. The truly BIG $'s gov't influence disregards growing hard times to peddle Norquist ideals & tax cuts for the investment class. That FORCES Y-O-U, Joe 6-pk, to pay higher overall taxes (&/or more US debt).

    Sounds like Ms. Long's 1 of those typical conservatives, anxious to promote more plutocracy.

    Hopefully, "TPS," will endorse Owens (D) over Doheny (R) though Doheny's a realist on Soc. Sec, he's GOP-horrid on taxes.

  6. loneoak
    Report Abuse
    loneoak - October 27, 2012 3:05 pm
    A puppet for Schumer nothing less, look at her voting record it speaks for itself, every vote the same as Schumer. Actions speak louder than words and her actions are very liberal and I do not see those actions representing upstate.


1) Comments must be contained to the topic of the articles only. Comments that stray from the direct subject of the article will be deleted.

2) Readers are free to comment on and debate other readers' comments, but comments must specifically address the issue(s) raised. Comments containing personal insults directed toward another reader in any form will be deleted.

3) Comments must be civil in tone, and there will be no name calling of any kind. Uncivil or inappropriate comments will be deleted, as will any comment containing profanities.

4) Comments critical of crime or accident victims will be deleted.

5) Comments that are potentially libelous, including those that contain accusations not supported by facts, will be deleted.

Commenters who abuse these policies will have their e-mail registrations revoked.


View the full commenting policy.

Thank you, and we hope you enjoy interacting with us and the community.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick


Search Homes for Sale

Search Classifieds