U pick'em Pigskin Payoff Contest Warren County Memories book

EDITORIAL: State can't nickel and dime rural school districts

2013-02-16T22:07:00Z 2013-02-18T11:33:13Z EDITORIAL: State can't nickel and dime rural school districts Glens Falls Post-Star
February 16, 2013 10:07 pm

With Gov. Andrew Cuomo, it appears his policies are all about appearances.

He wants to appear fiscally responsible while also appearing to care about education, so he passes a tax cap while continuing to insist on higher standards and new mandates, such as teacher evaluations.

While he’s busy trying to look good, rural school districts (like most of the ones in our area) are being squeezed in a pincer of rising costs and falling revenue.

Cuomo trumpets his budgetary achievements while school districts upstate slide toward insolvency.

Is the governor going to wait until rural schools reach a state of emergency before acknowledging the inequities in the way state aid is distributed?

The first problem is, because of the way schools are funded, wealthy districts in places like Long Island are much less dependent on state aid than poor districts in places such as Fort Edward.

A school in Long Island, surrounded by private properties worth millions of dollars — each — has a strong tax base from which to draw its funding. State aid is a welcome supplement in such a district, but not the critical source of operating funds, as it is in poor rural districts.

When state education aid gets cut, as it has over the past decade, poor districts suffer more than rich ones, because the poor districts are more reliant on state aid and less able to absorb cuts.

This is a longstanding structural problem tied to the way New York funds public education through property taxes. But the problems for rural districts have gotten much worse under Cuomo’s administration.

The promises made as the governor pushed his tax cap a couple of years ago were that it would be followed by mandate relief and perhaps also by a circuit-breaker law, which would limit the percentage of a property owner’s income that could go toward property taxes. No attempt to keep those promises has been made.

So rural school districts, which were never flush with cash, are now under tremendous pressure, caught between the tax cap on one side and state mandates on the other.

The governor has touted an increase in education aid in the coming year’s budget, but what he doesn’t talk about it is something called the “gap elimination adjustment,” which he used to close the state’s budget gap on the back of local school districts.

This adjustment takes state aid away from schools, district by district, and uses it to balance the state’s books. How much gets taken from each district depends on the state’s determination of a district’s wealth, based on the income of its residents and the value of its land.

The formula can get skewed in rural districts like Cambridge that are land-rich and cash-poor. The sale of a few beautiful old farms for high prices can make a place such as Cambridge appear, on paper, richer than it is, resulting in more money getting grabbed back by the state.

It sounds dry, but before your eyes glaze over, consider the consequences we’ve seen in Cambridge and other local districts: cuts to teachers and programs.

Residents can override the tax cap, but most cannot afford to pay bills that go up by 10 or 20 percent — many struggle to pay their property taxes now.

At the same time, we are all impoverished by failing to offer our kids a good education.

Gov. Cuomo’s approach is hurting, if not killing, the state’s rural school districts.

We’re not asking for the state to spend more, but we are demanding what the state spends be distributed fairly, according to equitable formulas that account for the circumstances of each district.

Gov. Cuomo owes the people of the state more than blanket policies geared more to making himself look good than helping the state prosper.

Local editorials represent the opinion of The Post-Star editorial board, which consists of Publisher Rick Emanuel, Editor Ken Tingley, Projects Editor Will Doolittle and citizen representative Robert Sledd.

Copyright 2015 Glens Falls Post-Star. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(4) Comments

  1. David Harris
    Report Abuse
    David Harris - November 29, 2013 8:42 am
    There are so many people who learn from experiences and continue working hard. Other people also get help from their experiences.
  2. Bruce Fraser
    Report Abuse
    Bruce Fraser - February 18, 2013 10:27 am
    This is a powerful editorial. The future of Rural School districts is endangered at this time. Rural education is an "inconvenience" for any state. With low population density--few economies of scale can be achieved by rural districts. Merger makes little sense as diesel fuel costs quickly offset any personnel savings that are achieved. The logic of incentivizing two large, but poor, school districts to merge is flawed. Once the incentive aid begins to decrease you are left with one very large, poor school district. Other states have found ways to continue to provide quality learning opportunities in rural settings. One of eight NY public school students attend schools in a rural setting. Our state has the eighth largest population of rural students in the nation. Solutions other than insolvency--or merger--need to be found! At this time Gov. Cuomo is setting the course for government in NY. He needs to make funding equity one of his priorities. Thanks Post-Star!
  3. ChuckR
    Report Abuse
    ChuckR - February 18, 2013 7:24 am
    Thanks for the editorial. I have been a teacher for 28 years in a rural New York school district. Governor Cuomo is systematically dismantling the rural school in favor of large consolidated districts. The 2% tax cap was the beginning of the process. Those who were in favor of the cap will begin to see the consequences as more and more rural schools begin the discussion of consolidation. The school as an institution in many small towns will be but a distant memory in 20 years I am afraid. Most tax-payers who were in favor of the 2% tax cap never gave a thought to the "unintended" consequences of its passage. I feel bad for the rural towns that will see a great part of their heritage consolidated into much larger, less identifiable, schools.
  4. bodie
    Report Abuse
    bodie - February 17, 2013 11:15 am
    Great Editorial .. while schools in our area debate keeping Pre-K,K Elementary Art,Music and 1 foreign language in Middle Schools,Modified,JV sports ..the wealthy districts debate over whether they can save Mandarin Chinese for 4th graders.????Where is the "advocate for students"on that one?????
    Maybe a message of necessity is needed to rush thru school mandate relief..We know they are experts on that !!!!!!!!!!!!


1) Comments must be contained to the topic of the articles only. Comments that stray from the direct subject of the article will be deleted.

2) Readers are free to comment on and debate other readers' comments, but comments must specifically address the issue(s) raised. Comments containing personal insults directed toward another reader in any form will be deleted.

3) Comments must be civil in tone, and there will be no name calling of any kind. Uncivil or inappropriate comments will be deleted, as will any comment containing profanities.

4) Comments critical of crime or accident victims will be deleted.

5) Comments that are potentially libelous, including those that contain accusations not supported by facts, will be deleted.

Commenters who abuse these policies will have their e-mail registrations revoked.


View the full commenting policy.

Thank you, and we hope you enjoy interacting with us and the community.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick