FORT ANN -- The town's rich military history extends back to the early 1700s, but remains unknown to many.

This concerns Hudson Valley Community College Professor Matthew Zembo because Battle Hill, the Revolutionary War battle site near Route 4, doesn't have much protection against people who might damage its historic value.

"The site deserves more respect than this," Zembo said.

Zembo studied British military history, including British Gen. John Burgoyne's Revolutionary War tactics and the engagements at Fort Ann.

Battle Hill has attracted attention lately as Troy Topsoil Co. proposed a rock quarry in its vicinity, worrying residents who fear a mining operation would ruin the historical value and prompting Zembo to delve back into the history of the site.

But according to Zembo, the site has been damaged before. He was involved with an archaeological dig at another historic site more than a decade ago, when a man approached him, saying he had been involved with metal-detecting at the Battle Hill site. The man mentioned that he had come across buttons and eye hooks, and described their formation in the ground, which likely means the man found bodies because of the way soldiers were buried during the Revolutionary War, Zembo said.

"They were buried where they died - he found buttons (in one spot) but not anywhere else," Zembo said. "Either he or someone he knew probably found bodies, kept digging anyway and didn't tell anyone."

There are likely others who have "raped that site," Zembo said.

Zembo calls such people "pot hunters" - people who go through historic sites with metal detectors in hopes of finding an artifact to sell or add to a private collection.

He thinks people have likely been going through the site since metal detectors became accessible, mostly because of the lack of historic protection for the site.

He wants to see Battle Hill turned into a historical site, a place where people could walk around and look at panels that would describe the history of the spot.

"Wouldn't it be nice if it would make people stop in Fort Ann?" Zembo said. "It's another site we could connect to the amazing history of this area."

Battle Hill is considered a Priority II battlefield by the American Battlefield Protection program, but isn't on the National Register of Historic Places.

A review of whether it should be listed on the register and if the mining operation would harm its historic value was ongoing as of last week, said Dan Keefe, a spokesman for the state Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation.

Battle Hill is located west of Route 4 and marked today by a plaque set in a rock face.

It may not be as well-known as the Revolutionary War battles at Ticonderoga and Saratoga, but it was part of an important campaign during the Revolutionary War. Americans camped in fields around the area before the Battle of Fort Ann took place. They were demoralized after Ticonderoga, the British "smelled blood" and were pursuing them, Zembo

said.

The British arrived and didn't expect the number of Americans who were there - they were outnumbered by a 3-1 margin by Americans. Still, many of the Americans were members of the militia and didn't have combat experience.

The British were given orders to get to the top of the hill, and a "pretty intense firefight" ensued. The British were running out of ammunition and the Americans were pressing, when the Americans heard "war whoops."

The Americans thought it was Americans Indians and they ran. What they actually heard was one British officer pretending to be an entire war party, Zembo said.

"One of the reasons you don't hear about it is because we didn't win, so it doesn't make us look good," Zembo said.

But the fact the Americans ultimately won a war against the British army, which could win a battle when they were outnumbered 3-1, was pretty amazing, Zembo said.

From a military standpoint, a lot happened around Fort Ann, aside from the Revolutionary War battle. Expeditions from Albany to Montreal in 1709 and 1711 saw thousands of Colonial men making a trip through the area to attack Montreal. During the 1709 effort, the men were camped in Fort Ann and heard the attack on Quebec was canceled.

"From that expedition alone, they probably had hundreds of men who died there of smallpox," Zembo said. "The sad thing is, there are no markers."

"This is how Fort Ann plays a role in history," Zembo said. "It's a strategic corridor, there are these natural routes of travel."

(8) comments

jd82

The story of Fort Ann is really interesting, ranking quite high in the battle stories of Upstate NY. Someday, I hope there is a "Battle Trail" from connecting some, if not all, of these spots as best as possible. Not only is it paying homage to our roots as a community but also leverages recreational activities, the asset to walk a few miles, a dozen, or more, to see the battle sites in a timeline would be an incredible economic development tool. Historical and recreational trails are something many other places are waking up to, or have already preserved through the ages (ie the walking trails of France attracting thousands of country wide tours). The Erie Canal trail ride is a small, but growing example of long-distance recreation and economic development. Just about putting our dollars toward something that creates returns on investment, preserves the land, and re-instills our the backbone to our local heritage.

ADK CURMUDGEON

The Battle of Saratoga was just the culmination of the "Turning Point of The Revolution"....the decisions and mistakes made, skirmishes fought and, hardships endured all are what happened on "The Battle Trail" between Whitehall and Fort Edward is what really did the Brits in and changed the course of the war. The bravery and heroics of American men and women pioneersat places like Fort Ann should not go unrecognized in our National History.

Hermit

From what I’ve been told, the British split into three groups. One traveled south from Whitehall which resulted in the confrontation at Battle Hill in Fort Ann.
The second group traveled by boat to the southern end of South Bay and was fired upon by Americans from a cliff called Dog Heaven on Diameter Mountain. The Americans had slowed the British enough to keep them from engaging in the actual battle in Fort Ann.
The third group of British traveled from Dresden on the old military, stage road behind Diameter Mountain. Coming from behind the Americans, pretty much wiped them out.

The old military Rd was dedicated with a plaque around 1976 and then abandoned shortly after by the town of Dresden. Unfortunately this turned the historical road into private, posted property.

jd82

@Hermit, what an unfortunate decision to abandon the road because it's not accessible to the public.

whatsthedeal

I agree we need to save the history of our region. It would be nice to see a historic trail created similar to that of the "Freedom Trail" of Boston. We live in an area extremely rich with history that founded our great nation.

sted

Fort Ann had the grandest of opportunities to transform the way and the means the public views the community...remember the push ot get the Northway north to canada? well, FtAnn residents and the town 'fathers'e deemed the road ridiculous because they wanted "real jobs".l.l take a look at Lake George, Bolton: these communities have a higher tax base than most anyother resort town around!!!
the only way Fort Ann (as a community) will ever think more than 2 years ahead is when those same; citizens realize it takes $$$$ to make money...investment in the future is something that is TAUGHT it is not inherent

boston


An important historical site, priceless.

yotman1

The comments by Matthew Zembo in this story are way out of line and show a typical bias by an uninformed professor who thinks he knows more than anyone else.

I have a MS in American History as well as BA's in European History AND Cultural Anthropology, I also have an MS in Education Admin and Policy Studies. I challenge Mr Zembo for state untrue things based on his personal bias. This is outrageous, as is the Post Star printing it without getting any additional information.

I started metal detecting in 2002 and I have NEVER once seen anyone dig up a body or detect on land without permission. A body in the ground for 200+ years would obviously,typically be totally deteriorated from interaction with ground minerals and water. For him to say that buttons found in a group HAD to be because there was a soldier buried there is irresponsible at best. There are places where coats and other equipment were discarded where one finds 100's of artifacts in a small confined area.

Welcome to the discussion.

Comments will not be posted if any of the following rules are violated:
- Comments must be contained to the topic of the articles only.
- Comments must be civil in tone and cannot contain personal insults directed toward another reader.
- Profanities cannot be used, including abbreviations or acronyms.
- Comments critical of crime or accident victims, or imply guilt are not allowed.
- Comments that are potentially libelous, including those that contain accusations not supported by facts are not allowed.
- Comments that appear to be taunting others who comment are not allowed.
- Comments should be brief and never more than 1,000 characters.