FORT EDWARD -- Washington County’s legal expert expects the state to soon enact a ban on workplace bullying for government employees, like lawmakers did in schools in 2010, a potential move at least one supervisor sees as an unwarranted softening of society.

County Attorney Roger Wickes advised the Board of Supervisors Government Operations Committee on Tuesday that anti-bullying activists are gaining traction in New York and across the country.

The state Legislature is expected to take up a proposed ban on workplace bullying among government employees next year, Wicks said.

“Welcome to namby-pamby land,” said Dresden Supervisor Bob Banks, as Wickes explained that the actual oversight requirements that would be imposed on local governments isn’t known.

The county, like all local governments in New York, already have sexual harassment and workplace violence policies that can see employees disciplined or fired if violated.

The new mandated equity policy would likely closely mirror sexual harassment bans without the gender-specific or sexual components, Wickes said.

“What it boils down to is: Don’t be a jerk,” Wickes said.

But one person’s bullying is another person’s “arm twisting,” some officials said.

Cambridge Supervisor William “Beaver” Watkins, who regularly does battle with an especially antagonistic local blogger, noted that elected officials regularly endure public bludgeonings that many would consider bullying.

“When you’re an elected official, get used to it,” Watkins said. “You’re going to get hammered.”

The state adopted an anti-bullying policy in 2010 for schools that expands the definition of harassment to include the creation of a hostile environment that could impact a student’s ability to learn.

The schools legislation requires teachers and administrators to report any reported bullying events and mandates the state Education Department to include “civility” training throughout the public education curriculum. It also requires schools, in some cases, to provide counseling to bullied students.

Greater awareness of bullying in society and several high-profile suicides have driven a lot of attention to social networking sites.

But supervisors had a hard time taking the likely expansion of the regulations to adults seriously.

“I think the county should have a dueling policy,” quipped Argyle Supervisor Bob Henke.

(6) comments


If government employees think workplace bullying is bad, they should try working in the private sector where there are ZERO punishments for employers who bully staff.

Right Now
Right Now

I thought this article was really interesting and informative. Bullying has become way out of control! I found this blog by Ron Bellanti really insightful. He finds some great articles pertaining to bullying!


Laws already in place but they want new laws so some polititician can claim they did something. Waste of time and tax payer money how about getting to thr problems that have not been solved. These laws on top of laws do nothing but cloud the water as we see every day in court, they were charged with this and it should have been that, harassment and bullying are one in the same with a different name.

Sceptical Mass

There's a big difference between a "bully" and a tough boss, a BIG difference.


Wow, this is getting out of control. We live in a world where everyone gets a ribbon or a certificate of appreciation not only at our schools but our jobs as well. The Government has turned everyone soft and lazy and when something negative happens to someone they don't know how to deal with it. Just tattle, tattle like a bunch of 3 yr olds until your hearts content. There's supposed to be fat people, skinny, goofy, short , tall, timid, shy,aggresive people and yes the occasional bully. Stop spoon feeding everyone and making it so easy. When the government figures out how to give us a shot that will make all our kids come out green, 115lbs. and 5' 7" we'll never have another problem again.


Well Said!!

Welcome to the discussion.

Comments will not be posted if any of the following rules are violated:
- Comments must be contained to the topic of the articles only.
- Comments must be civil in tone and cannot contain personal insults directed toward another reader.
- Profanities cannot be used, including abbreviations or acronyms.
- Comments critical of crime or accident victims, or imply guilt are not allowed.
- Comments that are potentially libelous, including those that contain accusations not supported by facts are not allowed.
- Comments that appear to be taunting others who comment are not allowed.
- Comments should be brief and never more than 1,000 characters.