Shining Stars Mobile Apps

Reports: PCB project may need to grow in scope

2010-01-21T20:05:00Z Reports: PCB project may need to grow in scopeBy NICK REISMAN Glens Falls Post-Star
January 21, 2010 8:05 pm  • 

FORT EDWARD -- Officials overseeing the project to remove PCB-laden muck from the Hudson River confirmed Thursday what longtime observers of the cleanup feared: the scope of the contamination is larger than believed.

A draft report issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency found the first year of the cleanup was hindered by underwater debris and delays at the sediment processing facility. It was also marked by higher-than-expected levels of PCB contamination.

In its draft report also released Thursday, General Electric Co. found that new productivity guidelines were needed to move the project forward so it can be completed on time.

"The purpose of the report is to ensure the project is more effective and it meets the goals EPA has established," said Mark Behan, of Behan Communications and a spokesman for GE. "We concluded that from the 18,000 data samples and our experience performing the dredging that some practical adjustments are necessary in the standards EPA established."

GE's report found that the migration of PCBs was more frequent than believed.

The company's report doesn't make specific recommendations and Behan said that aspect will be left up to a peer-review panel of experts who will study both reports.

Despite the delays, federal officials are confident the project will finish by 2015, its expected end date.

"If EPA's recommendations are implemented, we believe the project will still conclude in the six-year time frame," said agency spokeswoman Kristen Skopeck.

Both the agency and General Electric will exchange reports before submitting their final studies on the first year of the project.

Dredging crews removed 300,000 cubic yards of river sediment contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls, which were discharged by General Electric until 1976. Federal officials planned to dredge 265,000 cubic yards in the first year.

It remains unclear how much contaminated material remains in river, according to the EPA report. General Electric's report found that as much as six to eight times the amount of PCB-laden sediment will need to be removed in the next phase of the cleanup.

Ten out of the 18 areas slated for dredging work on the river were actually cleaned up. The additional eight units will be added to the second phase of the project.

"An estimate of the total volume of sediment likely to be removed from the river during Phase 2 is needed to fully evaluate the ability of the dredging and sediment processing design to remove, dewater, and dispose of the material," according to the report.

The long-delayed project started on May 15 and wrapped up the first stage of the cleanup in October. The project's base is a sprawling 110-acre facility on the Champlain Canal in Fort Edward and has offices for the local EPA staff in Hudson Falls.

The cleanup is on hiatus for one year and is expected to resume in 2011.

It wasn't until the project was actually under way did engineers realize how much contamination was beneath the water, said EPA spokeswoman Kristen Skopeck.

"Before we were actually in the river, we were basing it off theory," Skopeck said. "Once we did a dredge season, we have first-hand knowledge."

Skopeck said the draft's findings contradicted claims made by critics and opponents of the cleanup, namely that the river would either wash away or bury the PCB contamination.

"The amount of PCBs hasn't declined," she said. "They haven't been buried, they haven't broken down."

The government's draft report is available on the agency's Web site that tracks the project's progress,

GE's report can be found at its own Web site,

The data compiled by both reports is expected to be considered by a peer-review panel of experts assessing the effectiveness of the first year of the project, which officials at both General Electric and the federal government have always maintained is an experimental phase.

The final study is due to be released in February. Observers of the project were not shocked by the high level of contamination.

"For anyone who follows the project, it shouldn't be a great surprise to anybody," said David Carpenter, a professor of Environmental Sciences at the University at Albany.

Still, the breadth of the contamination is incredible, he said.

"It's just mind boggling," Carpenter said. "It's just mind boggling."

Copyright 2015 Glens Falls Post-Star. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(6) Comments

  1. Kyle York
    Report Abuse
    Kyle York - January 22, 2010 4:50 pm
    Van Renss-

    Not just a GOOD question... you've asked THE question. And the answer is irresponsible at best. And criminally negligent at worst. Ever since the "first thoughts" of GE and EPA, the written documents state that Hydraulic Suction (Cutter-Head) dredging might be suitable.

    After years of intense study, GE/EPA told the Community Advisory Board (CAB) that both MECHANICAl and HYDRAULIC dredging were appropriate and suitable. Each had strengths suited to various well-studied dredge sites.

    I'll check my records later, but it was at a CAB meeting when GE/EPA suddenly announced that Hydraulic dredging was no longer being considered. The CAB was stunned, left in disbelief, and clearly concerned that the decision was made to save money.

    So it is no great surprise to ANY person familiar with the pre-dredge studies that deep "reservoirs" of almost pure PCBs are surrounding Rogers Island. And in fact, those reservoirs are one of the sites ideal for Hydraulic Dredging. Details later.
  2. Van Renss
    Report Abuse
    Van Renss - January 22, 2010 12:13 pm
    An in the Beginning, the discussions all centered around a
    method of river bottom sediment removal by a contained vacuum
    suction method. Where is exactly did that approach get shelved?

    The now Offshore General Electric Company's activities are based in India, the one surrounded by the Indian Ocean. The
    60% of GE's business is financial based, so when you speak to a person using their second language, English, try to be patient and hear them out, when they attempt to provide explaination to your computer, your income tax preparer and on
  3. tony
    Report Abuse
    tony - January 22, 2010 11:57 am
    yayaya, It already was in the water. The contamination had to be removed. Now it's been proven that it won't break down on it's own. And now that we know the contamination is 25 times worse than anyone thought. That's 25 times the reason to get it out.
  4. Yayaya
    Report Abuse
    Yayaya - January 22, 2010 8:09 am
    The story is missing something:
    The AP (1/22, Hill) reports, "Hudson River dredging released almost 25 times more PCBs into the water than expected,"
  5. newsguy94
    Report Abuse
    newsguy94 - January 22, 2010 5:09 am
    Nope, saw this coming. No surprising developments at all.
  6. vonrick
    Report Abuse
    vonrick - January 21, 2010 8:57 pm
    Is there anybody that did NOT see this comeing?


1) Comments must be contained to the topic of the articles only. Comments that stray from the direct subject of the article will be deleted.

2) Readers are free to comment on and debate other readers' comments, but comments must specifically address the issue(s) raised. Comments containing personal insults directed toward another reader in any form will be deleted.

3) Comments must be civil in tone, and there will be no name calling of any kind. Uncivil or inappropriate comments will be deleted, as will any comment containing profanities.

4) Comments critical of crime or accident victims will be deleted.

5) Comments that are potentially libelous, including those that contain accusations not supported by facts, will be deleted.

Commenters who abuse these policies will have their e-mail registrations revoked.


View the full commenting policy.

Thank you, and we hope you enjoy interacting with us and the community.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Search Homes for Sale

Search Classifieds