Summer iPad Air Giveaway! 20 Under 40

Former Queensbury restaurateurs face new charges

2010-12-31T12:10:00Z Former Queensbury restaurateurs face new chargesBy DON LEHMAN, Glens Falls Post-Star
December 31, 2010 12:10 pm  • 

QUEENSBURY -- The former proprietors of Nemo's New England Seafood & Steakhouse are in more trouble with the law, despite the fact their restaurant closed nearly two months ago.

The Granville couple who ran the restaurant were arrested Wednesday - weeks after they were accused of underpaying employees of the Route 9 eatery - on felony criminal charges that accuse them of stealing property from the building they rented.

James P. Parent, 51, and Michelle D. Parent, 49, were each charged with fourth-degree grand larceny for allegedly taking furniture and appliances from the building, according to State Police.

Among the items stolen was a commercial refrigerator, a sink, a beverage cooler, 12 bar stools and other fixtures, according to the State Police. The items were valued at more than $2,000.

Gabriel Sutton, whose family owns the property, said some of the items were recovered after he contacted the couple and asked that they be returned. But he said the police were called after the Parents stole additional items - including a sink and a cooler - when they were allowed into the building in late November to return some of the stools. Sutton said it was Thanksgiving weekend, and "I took my eye off the place for a few minutes," only to have a second round of thefts occur.

"We negotiated an amicable departure, and they ransacked the place," Sutton said. "We did everything we could to avoid this. But when they went in there and took the other items, that was really the last straw."

He said State Police had been trying to locate the Parents for weeks but found "a number of fake addresses" for them before tracking them down in Granville.

Both were released pending prosecution in Queensbury Town Court.

The criminal case comes after the Parents were cited in November by the state Department of Labor for not paying employees over the summer who dressed in a lobster costume and waved to passing motorists in an effort to drum up business.

In all, the state ordered the Parents to pay $4,645 in back wages, fees and interest to 17 workers - most of them foreign students - who filed claims that they were not paid. In an interview in August, the Parents claimed they were paying the employees properly and that the dispute was the result of a language barrier.

The restaurant opened in November 2009 and closed in the fall amid the Labor Department action and a dispute with the town over the restaurant's use of costume-clad employees stationed on Route 9 to market the eatery. The building is currently vacant.

Sutton said his family has been working with a new tenant who hopes to open a restaurant in February.

Copyright 2015 Glens Falls Post-Star. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(2) Comments

  1. couldbeanybody
    Report Abuse
    couldbeanybody - December 31, 2010 10:03 pm
    We eat at local restaurants quite often...and let me tell you that there place was one of the WORST restaurants I have ever eaten at! Prices out the roof, quality of steak terrible. And now to read they are criminals...heck, they were already that for just running a crappy restaurant!!
  2. justanotherNYer
    Report Abuse
    justanotherNYer - December 31, 2010 7:43 pm
    According to this acticle, it took police weeks to locate them for whatever reason. If they were that difficult to locate because they didn't want to be found and it took weeks of police resources to be located why would the court release them for a future court appearance with no bail or jail mentioned. It appears that it would be less costly to the taxpayers to put the burden for the defendants to show up at court on their pocketbooks if bail is required than to send out police again and again to attempt to locate them if they choose not to return to answer their charges.


1) Comments must be contained to the topic of the articles only. Comments that stray from the direct subject of the article will be deleted.

2) Readers are free to comment on and debate other readers' comments, but comments must specifically address the issue(s) raised. Comments containing personal insults directed toward another reader in any form will be deleted.

3) Comments must be civil in tone, and there will be no name calling of any kind. Uncivil or inappropriate comments will be deleted, as will any comment containing profanities.

4) Comments critical of crime or accident victims will be deleted.

5) Comments that are potentially libelous, including those that contain accusations not supported by facts, will be deleted.

Commenters who abuse these policies will have their e-mail registrations revoked.


View the full commenting policy.

Thank you, and we hope you enjoy interacting with us and the community.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick